nincs határ sng-nél.csak annyin szabad játszani amennyire oda tudsz figyelni.de itt a lényeg h minél többre tudjál
Sziasztok. Ismerősöm játszotta a partit.
4,50$ 180 fös stg. Ez itt sima push? a bb feszes fish.
weaktight | Hand | 63s - No Limit Holdem Tournament
jaja sima 100%al lehet tolni
11hand 36/36, 67%steal alapján itt mit csinálnátok ?
ITM-ben vagyunk 16an.
PokerStars Hand #75900824263: Tournament #519834910, $2.28+$0.22 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XIII (600/1200) - 2012/02/20 10:16:14 CET [2012/02/20 4:16:14 ET]
Table '519834910 6' 9-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: ABTOCAH (48619 in chips)
Seat 2: Choss74868 (24787 in chips)
Seat 3: xr7s (14045 in chips)
Seat 4: Luckyb555 (11027 in chips)
Seat 6: PoKeRaRcSuNY (16181 in chips)
Seat 7: weiss1981 (23474 in chips)
Seat 8: alstef559 (5385 in chips)
Seat 9: Szymonal (12575 in chips)
ABTOCAH: posts the ante 125
Choss74868: posts the ante 125
xr7s: posts the ante 125
Luckyb555: posts the ante 125
PoKeRaRcSuNY: posts the ante 125
weiss1981: posts the ante 125
alstef559: posts the ante 125
Szymonal: posts the ante 125
PoKeRaRcSuNY: posts small blind 600
weiss1981: posts big blind 1200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to PoKeRaRcSuNY [3s 3c]
alstef559: folds
Szymonal: folds
ABTOCAH: folds
Choss74868: folds
xr7s: raises 12720 to 13920 and is all-in
Luckyb555: folds
PoKeRaRcSuNY: folds
weiss1981: folds
Uncalled bet (12720) returned to xr7s
xr7s collected 4000 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 4000 | Rake 0
Seat 1: ABTOCAH folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: Choss74868 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: xr7s collected (4000)
Seat 4: Luckyb555 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: PoKeRaRcSuNY (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: weiss1981 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: alstef559 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: Szymonal folded before Flop (didn't bet)
...
Jó a dobás.
Melyk a legkisebb pár emire meg lehet adni ?
Megtudná mondani valaki,hogy a normál 4,5$-os 180 fős SNG-ken hány órától indul be az élet!?
Megtudná mondani valaki,hogy a normál 4,5$-os 180 fős SNG-ken hány órától indul be az élet!?
There have been several requests for additional 180-man buy-ins.
I'll start with the idea of a higher buy-in regular speed. We currently have a $4.50 regular speed. In the past we had a couple of higher regular buy-ins so I looked at data from January and February 2011 to see how they performed. At the time, the $4.40 was comparable to the current $4.50 in terms of popularity. The next higher buy-in was $11, which ran far less often. In fact the $4.40 ran about 25x more often than the $11.
While we could deploy Sit & Gos that hardly ever run, as a principle we try to avoid that. This is because it can be frustrating for players, especially recreational players, to register for Sit & Gos that don't run, even after several hours of waiting.
The next option is a turbo to fit in the gap between the $2.50 and the $8.00 turbos. The issue in this case is that the hypothetical new turbo would clash with the $4.50 regular. While it is true that not many 180-man turbo players also play regular, a good proportion of the 180-man regular players do play turbos. A 180-man turbo in the region of $4.50 could draw sufficient traffic away from the $4.50 regular to significantly affect the liquidity of that tournament. Therefore, for the moment we won't be adding anything in this area.
Option three is a turbo 180 with a buy-in higher than the current $35. This might run during peak times but very infrequently at other times, which means it runs into the same issue of potentially frustrating players. On the other hand, the higher we move in terms of buy-in, the smaller the likely proportion of recreational players. Therefore we are trying a compromise option. This Sunday, a $60 turbo 180-man Sit & Go will be available all day. We’ll see how it performs and decide how to proceed on that basis.
Finally, several players have suggested a higher buy-in rebuy. I have looked at several scenarios for trying to make this work without causing problems elsewhere but so far I haven’t found one. Firstly, because of the nature of rebuys they have to be judged as a tournament with a higher buy-in than their face value and their potential liquidity estimated on that basis. If we assume that a new rebuy might fit somewhere between the $8 turbo and the $15 turbo, it probably should be judged on the same basis as the existing $35 in terms of likely liquidity. This view is reinforced by looking at the popularity of the $3.50 and how it compares to the popularity of existing turbo buy-ins. So the first question is, how likely is it that a rebuy in the $10-12 range might have sufficient liquidity to run?
The second question is where would the players come from? The likely answer is the $15 and $35 turbos and possibly the $8 turbo and perhaps some scheduled MTT players. The $35 in particular would be vulnerable to any reduction in the player pool and the $15 could be significantly affected as well. Looking at a lower rebuy, perhaps around $6, runs into similar problems with the $3.50 certainly being affected and the $8 and $15 turbos suffering liquidity issues. I’ve reluctantly concluded that there just isn’t a place to put such a tournament without looking at our entire 180 offering from scratch. I really don’t want to contemplate that when the 180s in general run very well. In a sense, the success of the 180s means that any argument to change them has to be very compelling indeed.
Two Plus Two Poker Forums - View Single Post - *** OFFICIAL PokerStars MTTSNG Suggestion Thread ***